Ending Life without Parole Part 2

 

Ending Life without Parole Part 1

Ending Prison Sentences of Life Without Parole

 This blog is actually a speech that was performed on January 5, 2022,for an Oral Communication class taught by Keri Thompson at Emerson College. Emerson College has a prison program called EPI, Emerson Prison Initiative which is held at MCI-Concord.

Thanks to my college partaker, Anya, I was recommended to post this on my blog.

"Ending Prison Sentences of Life Without Parole"

By: Peter Bin

Imagine waking up to something you hate everyday. Imagine never having any privacy or never being able to eat your favorite food. Imagine having to live in a 6x10 bathroom. Imagine never being able to enjoy the milestones of your love ones. Imagine having to deal with these scenarios for the rest of your life. In the book Dante's inferno, he describes a similar situation, where one of the stages of hell is a place where you are tortured by the thoughts and images of the things, people and events you once loved, but never to be able to touch it or enjoy it. Today I will be talking about what some consider a form of hell, I will be talking about life sentences without parole and why we should end these sentences.

This is an important subject to me because I am serving a natural life sentence for a crime I did not commit and for I life I did not take. So I know how easy it is in this State to be sentenced to life due to certain laws.

This topic should matter to all of us, because it has been a growing trend in America to imprison people and to imprison them to life sentences. According to the Harvard Political Review, America is the world leader of incarceration, with the most prisons on the planet. America has more people serving life than the entire prison population of Denmark. This topic is part of a bigger picture, which is prison reform, the way we are incarcerating people effects our community financially and mentally.

So today I want to tell you why we should end these life w/o parole sentences, by explaining how easy it is to be convicted to life w/o parole, by explaining to you why people serving life sentences w/o parole should be released, and what I think justice means to me.

Life without parole can be imposed on individuals who never took a life. Under Massachusetts's joint venture/felony murder law it allows individuals to be sentence to natural life "without evidence" that the person intended to cause any harm. For example they could be outside waiting for an individual, not knowing that individual is committing a crime or even just provided an item used in the crime but remained at home. Under this law, if a person does anything that the State consider as furthering a criminal enterprise you are liable to be sentence to life without parole. The New England Innocence Project states this law disproportionately effects people of color. The State and law enforcement has commonly labeled people of color as gang members even if they may not be. When law enforcement see a group of people of color wearing the same type of baseball caps, they're consider gang members. When people not of color are all seen wearing the same baseball caps, they are just baseball fans. When a person is label a gang member the bar is even set lower for the state to convict someone to life without parole. Because the State looks at anything a gang member does as an act of furthering a criminal enterprise. For example, if a person label a gang member answers a phone call that may be from a person whom just committed a crime of murder. The state can assumed because your labeled a gang member and you answered a phone call you may of helped that person and you are liable to a life sentence. Even if that call had nothing to do with a crime. This commonly happens to people of color.

In 2012 Massachusetts passed house bill 4286 that gives a three strikes penalty that can sentence individuals to life without parole for crimes that do no involve murder. It makes 20 crimes eligible and repeated offenders eligible to be sentence to natural life.

I bring up these scenarios because I believe no one deserves to die in prison for someone's elses actions and no one deserves to die in prison because of harsh laws.

Why should we give lifers a chance to come back to the community? The cost of housing prisoners are high and effecting tax payers dollars. According to the Vera institute research, the cost of housing a person in Massachusetts is over $50,000 and can rise to $140,000 for an elderly person . In Massachusetts there are over 10,000 people in prison, which means we are spending over $500 million dollars a year in this state alone to keep people incarcerated. When this money can be used for prison reform in helping people get mental health assistance, programs and education to lower recidivism rates.

There is a misconception that lifers are the most violent inmates and likely to re-offend because they have this "nothing to lose" mentality. This theory is completely wrong. A number of studies have shown people convicted to life are unlikely to recommit crimes and misconduct is low compared to nonlife prisoners. In many prisons across the country life prisoners are frequently called upon to act as role models and mentors. Look at the father program we have here, almost everyone in that program who mentor is serving life without parole. In another scenario, in 2012 in Maryland over 100 lifers were set free due to a due process violation in their case, til this day not one of them have returned to prison. 

In Massachusetts we know these lifers would not re-offend. How do we know this? When Massachusetts passed a law that ended life without parole for anyone who was charged with 1st degree murder under the age of 18, the parole board was able to see many people who thought they would spend the rest of their lives in prison. The parole board was surprise to see these individuals who had served 20, 30, 40 years had completed every D.O.C. program and some even had college degrees before the law passed. The parole board ask these individuals why did they do all of these programs knowing they may never be able to use these learned skills in society. One of the men who was up for parole answered "although I thought I was never coming home, I still had some hope and I wanted to become a better person for myself, for my family, and for the mistakes I made in the past". According to Harvardpolitics.com prisoners who participate in education have a 43% lower chance of incarceration, and every dollar spent on prison education saves the government $4-$5 dollars on re-incarceration. As you can see in this class room, many of us are lifers, we can all live by the misconception of what society thinks of us, but I believe we are all here because we believe our lives still have meaning.

Last I want to tell you want justice means to me. I know in free society justice usually means sending someone away to prison for the rest of their lives. I do not believe justice should be an eye for an eye solution. I do not believe justice is knowing another person and their family is suffering for how ever long. I know I do not have any right to tell a victim of crime how they can cope with their lost. But what I can say is, from a person in prison, I believe justice is to be able to face the ones we hurt and make reconciliation and forgiveness.

There is a program called "Restorative Justice", where people in prison meet victims of crime to find a place where they can reconcile and help the ones they hurt heal. I know for many people that is a lot to ask for, but I hope we can all be open to these ideas. Because people who served a long time are eager to make things right, for forgiveness and eager to earn and demonstrate their capacity to contribute in a positive way to society.

I like to end this speech with this quote from a former lifer, Michael Mendoza, "We are not convicts or ex-convicts, we are not felons, we are not inmates, we are PEOPLE, people that have a way to give back". Thank you.

Cites and sources:

-My attorney Cynthia Mousseau of the New England Innocence Project

-"The Price if Prisons - Prison Spending in 2015" by Vera Institute, www.vera.org

- Commonwealth v. Brown 477 Mass. 805 (2017)

-  "Recidivism Imprisons American Progress" By Liz Benecchi, August 8, 2021, Harvard Political Review. www.HarvardPolitics.com/recidivism-american-progress/

- "A New Lease On Life" by Ashley Nellis Ph.D, Sentencing Project, www.sentencingproject.org

- "Americas Increasing Use of Life Long Term Sentences" by Ashley Nellis Ph.D, Sentencing Project, www.sentencingproject.org

To help end these sentences please visit: www.change.org/p/tell-massachusetts-to-change-felony-murder-law

The Ripple Effects of Cambodia's Killing Fields in America

Written By: Peter Bin

      From it's ancient wars with Indonesia and Champa, to the betrayal of their Thai allies, struggles with Vietnam, and the genocide committed by the Khmer Rouge; Cambodians have dealt with bloodshed for centuries.
    I can recall a conversation with my father regarding the ancient temple, Preah Vihear, located on the border of Thailand and Cambodia. Gunfire had been exchanged between the two countries, in which caused rumors of the possibility of war. Hearing this, I asked my father, "What do you think if Cambodia went to war with Thailand?". He replied, "We have nothing to worry about, Cambodia has years of experience in combat in which Thailand lacks". I look back at my father's reply and think of our history. I come to ask myself this question: "When will violence end for Cambodians and when will we ever see true peace?".
     Over forty years ago, 2.5 million Cambodians were killed by Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge regime. The genocide caused a flood of Cambodians to seek refuge in the United States. Refugees populated States such as California and Massachusetts; causing Lowell, Massachusetts to have the second largest Cambodian population in the country, with Lynn, Massachusetts following in third. Similar to most immigrants who come to the United States, Cambodians shared the American dream.  Unfortunately, for many the escape from conflict was not over. Children of the refugees had fall victim to another type of war; a war carried in the streets by neighborhood gangs.
     While scores of Cambodian parents were dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder or working to make their American dreams come true, their children were left in neighborhoods that were surrounded by drugs and violence. Young men and women were lured by the attraction of gangs. It brought a sense of family, friends, income, and protection from racism. Gangs created a warrior-like lifestyle, in which many Cambodians believed ran in their veins.
     As a youth attending grade school, I seen my fair share of the gang culture. These young men and women were convinced they were at war with other Cambodians. Their conversations would consist of planning attacks, scouting for new enemy locations, and creating details on particular rivals. Listening to their conversations you would have believed they were part of a military group. But they were just kids, who wish was to have their rivals completely eliminated. These kids had no idea that they were speaking of genocide. There was no political reasoning for their belief. They had no real answers of why they wanted these other kids dead.
    Many of them dedicated their lives to the gangs, which caused a large number of grade school dropouts. According to an American Reframe documentary, Cambodians have the highest highschool dropout rate among Asian minority groups. It is a rate that is hard to believe, stereotypically Asians are considered to prosper well in education.
     From the year 2000-2010, gang violence within the Cambodian community of Lynn, Massachusetts was at an all time high. Not one person came in to try to mediate the tensions between the rival gangs. The only answer to the solution was to let the police deal with it. In 2010, the Federal government stepped in with "Operation Melting Pot 1 and 2". Federal agents raided neighborhoods and sent a number of men to prison.
     A mother of one of the arrested spoke of how much fear she had felt during the raids. She stated agents wearing mask and wielding guns had kicked in her door during the dark hours of the morning. Family members young and old were ordered to lie on the floor. The ordeal gave her flashbacks of the Khmer Rouge days, triggering her PTSD. It reminded her of how the Khmer Rouge would round up their victims in the middle of the night, ordering them to lie in a ditch as they await to be slaughtered.
     It is believed that the Cambodian gang culture is a ripple effect of Pol Pot's killing fields. Similar to what has happen to the youth in America, the Khmer Rouge lured and recruited young men and women from poor rural areas. These kids had no educational background. They were misled to believe a prosperous life and new utopia was in store for the future.  To obtain this goal, Pol Pot ordered his followers to eliminate all who were educated, religious, mix ethnicity or thought to be a spy. Pol Pot gave his adolescent followers the power to control another human beings life; a power they had never experienced. This made it easy for the Khmer Rouge to manipulate the young in killing their own people.
         In America, young Cambodians are continuing to kill each other, but for what cost?
    When a person is murdered, two lives are lost and two mothers mourn. To hear a mother's pain from losing a child, is a sound like no other. You can feel her wounds opening, it penetrates like a sword to the heart. I remember Savorn Prom, who was killed at the age of 17. His mother hugged his casket, begging to be with her son as he entered the crematory furnace. I recall looking at the front page of the Lynn Daily Item Newspaper, where there was a photo of Kevin Keo's mother crying as he was sentenced to life without parole. I once was sitting in a prison cell, as I watched on the TV screen, a Cambodian family mourning the lost of Vannark Chourb, who was murdered only after a year of being freed from prison. I have seen young Cambodian men enter the prison system with pain and sorrow in their eyes, because they believe this is where their life ends.
     Our families came to America to escape war and bondage, not to return to it. It is rare in our community to see someone who wants to educate the youth and instill peace. When these kids join a gang, other Cambodians shun and ignore them. The ones who do make it out the gangs, rarely or never come back to educate these kids on why they left.
      Along with the lack of help for the youth, our elders receive no assistance with mental health for post traumatic stress disorder that was caused by the killing fields of Pol Pot.
     The reason for this absence of education and assistance may stem from the fact that Cambodians live by the belief of forgetting about their painful past and to never speak on it again. But as people who survived war, genocide, gangs, and prison or ones who have experienced success, have a responsibility. We have the responsibility to educate our youth and support our elders. We must share our experience and no longer let our community be ignored. Without education, growth and support from each other, we are stuck in a revolving cycle of bloodshed, imprisonment, and poverty.
-------
Peter Bin is an advocate for the incarcerated. He is also a prison blogger @ www.PeterBinJusticeForAll.com
                                    Contact him @
                                    Instagram@PeterRock781
                                    Facebook.com/PeterBin781
                                    PeterBin781@Gmail.com
                                    Corrslink.com: Peter Bin W105814

Modern Day Slavery

Believe it or not, slavery still exist in America today. Incarceration is a form of slavery, as the 13th Amendment's text acknowledges: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States".
     In America, prisons have become a form of business, where billionaires invest in opening private prisons for their own personal gains. Here in Massachusetts, facilities such as North Central Correctional Institutions have their prisoners doing landscape and kitchen work for no pay at all. The institution call it volunteer work. What they tell their prisoners is: if an inmate is willing to volunteer, eventually these volunteers will be able to move to a position to earn good time (time-off their sentence), the next position is to move to a slot which earns $1.00 a day. Does this system sound familiar?
     Before Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves, this was the same system used in slavery. Slaves would work endlessly in the fields, earning next to nothing. The ones who could earn money from their so-called masters, would save the little they earned, hoping they can buy their freedom back. Along with the dream of buying their freedom, they had the dream of buying back their children or family members.
     This system is also used in the sex trade, another form of slavery. Women from Asia or a third world country who is sold into the sex trade is often told the same. They are told each day they must meet a goal of performing sex acts on a large number of clients. To earn their freedom back, their is a set number of men they have to sleep with. The number ranges to the thousands and it could take years to buy and regain their freedom.
     In the United States, prisons have turned into concrete plantations. We are the top ranking country to have the most prisons in the world. There are over 2 million people incarcerated in America. The idea of profiting from prison labor has played a major role to advance mass incarceration in the United States. Companies such as CoreCivic and GEO profit from private prisons and prison labor. These companies trade on the New York stock exchange, in which they hold power and influence for an expanding market share. Similar to the history of slavery, these people are profiting from human misery.
     Mass incarceration continue to grow due to prosecutors scare tactics. According to Criminal Legal News "prosecutors wreck havoc on the life of a person who insist he or she is innocent and want to exercise their right to a jury trial". Prosecutors over charge suspects to frighten them into a plea bargain, in turn to avoid severe penalties. The overwhelming majority of criminal convictions are the consequence of plea bargains, more than 95% are by guilty pleas. Quoted from Dan Stohr an Illinois attorney, "when you have been pushed around and ground down, that may seem like the best choice under the circumstances".
    Even at trial it is hard for a defendant to effectively fight and claim their innocence. The law gives jurors less discretion than in the past. Many of the defense arguments that were carried in criminal trials a century ago are off limits in today's systems. Defendants find it harder to claim a lack of criminal intent, when that concept is defined more automated and much favorable to the government. Criminal law does not function as law. Rather the law defines a menu of options for prosecutors and police officers as they see fit.
     All who is employed in the criminal justice system or have a stake in it, reaps the benefits from the imprisonment of a human being. Mass incarceration is needed for inmate labor, which is used to get the highest possible returns on profits. Without inmate labor, prisons could not run properly.
     For example, Massachusetts's maximum security prison, Sousa Baranowski Correction Center, has experienced times where it could not properly function due to work stoppages and hunger strikes. In 2016, there were rumors that the Department of Corrections(D.O.C) wanted to make visiting procedures more difficult for families of the incarcerated. This caused inmates to refuse to work and eat. For many inmates, family contact is the most valuable aspect of their lives. The inmate work stoppage caused Sousa Baranowski officials to panic. Prison staff members were now forced to do the hard labor work to keep the facility operating. The prison staff despised this line of work, believing it was below them. As the strike continued, prison officials try their best to negotiate and compromise with the inmates. They convinced inmates to return to work, in exchange, there would be no modifications in the visiting procedures.
     In 2018, the rumors of the change in the D.O.C visiting policy came true. The D.O.C. limited the number of family members who can visit. Families now have to go through a vigorous visiting procedure process. Inmates are now forced to choose between love ones to be added on a pre-approved list. The 2016 negotiations was a lie.
     In the prison system, history is repeating itself. We the incarcerated, have become slaves for the rich. They call it volunteer work, but is it volunteer work when this is the only option to buy our freedom back? They call slave work "good time" to get days off of our sentence. But they barely offer programs, trade skills development or education to rehabilitate inmates to be good when they enter society. So what "good" comes from profiting on human misery?
     Families were separated and torn apart due to slavery. The D.O.C does the same when it makes visiting procedures difficult for an inmate's family.  In turn, the D.O.C's visiting system deters families away. The number of visitors has drastically dropped. Correctional officers praise the decrease, stating it has made their job much easier.
    The masters of today's criminal justice system have nothing to lose from this mismanagement. They never bear the cost and see the consequences of their bad decisions. When a person is accused of a crime, they are no longer seen as humans. No one cares what happens to them, as long as they go to prison. They become another profitable pawn to a business that many call a system.

A Topic Rarely Spoken About: Suicide

Suicide statistics is on the rise, but we rarely speak about it. Among adolescents and adults, many have become part of the growing rate. As a person serving a life sentence, I would be lying if I said I never thought of suicide. I believe it is common for the thought of suicide to cross the minds of men and women who are serving a long prison sentence.

Being in prison we lose everything: friends, relationship with our kids and family, our financial situation fall apart, our love ones struggle without us, some may even leave us. Any of these scenarios will likely cause depression.

When I was convicted to a life sentence without parole, my life flashed before my eyes. It was like a scene from a movie, in which someone is about to die. One of the worst feelings I had ever felt.

After being convicted I did not want to be alone. I wanted to be around people so I can take my mind off losing my life. But since I had a stay on my sentencing (because the prosecutor withheld exculpatory evidence), the county jail placed me in solitary confinement, due to the fact I was now considered “a convicted murderer”. Not only I was placed in solitary, my clothes was taken away from me.

My status was put on high and I was no longer allowed to be next to any human beings unless I was handcuffed. I was considered a danger to everyone, including myself, although I showed no signs of it. They fed me only finger food, mainly bologna sandwiches and chips. My last meal was at 2:30 p.m. I starved through out the day. The system was kicking me down, when I was already down.

Soon after, my girlfriend came to see me. It was a painful visit. She was beautiful and I knew I could not be with her. She was as devastated as I was. I remember her punching the glass and saying “what will I do without you!”. She told me then “you have to keep fighting to come home to me”. She made me promise not to give up.

For three months this is how I lived. Living in those conditions made it hard to take her advice and keep my promise. My mental health started to deteriorate. Although I initially did not want to take my own life, I started to consider it. Just the thought of spending the rest of my life in prison made me felt as there was nothing to live for.

One day I decided to take action. I tried to tear a mat apart to make a noose. But luckily the mat was tear proof.

From time to time throughout my incarceration I still would contemplate suicide. Although those thoughts crossed my mind, I never showed I was in despair. I smiled often, I acted as nothing was affecting me, but I was dying inside.

I once told someone how I felt. They responded with “you have to love yourself before you can love anyone else”. Hearing that I thought “what is there to love about myself? I’m in prison and I can not offer nothing to myself or to others. My life has no purpose, no meaning. I feel like a burden to my family who has to support me”.

Even the fight for my freedom has weighed heavily on me. All I hear is “no” after “no”. The more no’s I heard , the more I knew my dreams of being free was out of reach. Each “no” was an unbearable pain.

I was at the point where I thought death would bring me happiness and I would finally be free. But when it came time to take action, I would always fail.

One day I read something about suicide. It said “when ever you feel like you want to take your life, think about it and give it a few days before you try to do something harmful”. I think that is one of the best advice I found, because something in your life can change and it can impact your feelings. If I did not find that advice, I do not know if I would still be here.

I took that advice. Although I am still incarcerated, I know right now my main purpose is fighting to prove I am innocent. It is something worth fighting for and I am making progress. If I did not have something to fight for, I may of given up. I admit, it has been tough, many people have come and gone. There might be more “no’s” ahead, but I am fighting.

To anyone struggling with life, remember it will not be a cake walk, everyday can be a battle. The thought of giving up might still be there and probably won’t go away for awhile. But if we fight to get through it, we will find that piece of hope we need to keep going. Just believe what ever your going through will end one day. We just got to fight to get there. A little hope can make a big impact.

Secondary DNA Evidence Putting Innocent Men and Women Behind Bars

DNA evidence has been consider "the magic bullet" used by prosecutors to convict a defendant in a criminal trial. When a jury hears DNA evidence, a phenomenon called the CSI-effect occurs. The CSI-effect is when the existence of television crime shows effect the minds of jurors. These shows often inform its audience that DNA is concrete evidence of who committed the crime. A number of studies show that jurors rate DNA evidence as accurate 95 percent of the time and convincing of a defendant's guilt 94 percent of the time.

Recently a small number of reports regarding DNA has questioned the reliability of such evidence. Reports of secondary DNA and flawed forensics testing procedures are starting to come to light. The President's Council Advisors of Science and Technology and the National Institute of Standard and Technology has produced these reports.

For sake of explanation, secondary DNA is an occurrence of an individuals DNA being transferred to an object or location without such individual touching the object or  being at location of the found DNA.

The individual's DNA can be transferred in several ways:
-Person A and person B touch hands. Person B then touch an object. Person A's DNA has now been transferred to that object.
-Person A and person B  touch the same object. Person B then touch a second object. The second object now has Person A's DNA.
-Person A touch an object, the object then touch another object. Both objects now contain Person A's DNA.

These are just a few examples of secondary DNA transfer.

In past news articles, the National Institute of Justice and other institutes showed little interest for secondary DNA research. However in a recent article, the National Institute of Standard and Technology withheld a report regarding secondary DNA for five years. The report could have been used by criminal defendants and stop wrongful convictions.

The report titled "NIST Interlaboratory Studies Involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13) Variations Observed and Lesson Learned" showed in a research experiment, that 74 out 108 laboratories put an innocent individual DNA at a crime scene. It also showed due to complexity, the evidence used in the research produced DNA of two individuals, when indeed there were five individual DNAs in the mixture. Only 7 laboratories testing procedures did produce accurate results.
In conclusion, the report showed how DNA testing procedures could be flawed. Either putting an innocent person at the crime scene or causing people to believe there was only two individual DNAs on an item or scene, when actually there were five DNA sources.

Withholding such report gave jurors five years of bad interpretation of DNA evidence.

In the case of Peter Bin, police found a Boston Red Sox baseball cap at the crime scene. The witness described a white male with blonde hair and blue eyes wearing the same baseball cap. Upon testing the hat for forensics, two DNAs were found. One to an unknown source, the other allegedly linked to Peter Bin. But the problem was, Bin had an alibi and was not a white male. Bin was a Cambodian male with brown skin.

Although there was alibi evidence and a non matching description, the CSI-effect took over the jury. Bin was convicted and sentence to life without parole.

If the report was available, an analyst would been able to go into court and effectively school a jury and judge there are other explanations for this DNA to be there. The DNA could of been placed innocently or through secondary transfer. The defense could of reviewed the testing procedures and found flaws. Most certainly of all, the report could have prevented Peter Bin's wrongful conviction.

People on a jury and in society need to be educated on DNA and understand it is not the magic bullet.